-
Trustee
Captain
Originally Posted by
tweakstick
Yeah, the last time I remember us actually using thermobaric weapons was in Fallujah and the mountains of Afghanistan. I have no moral issue with them whatsoever.
What I do have an issue with is that we don't use them in defense or an actual declared war. We had no damn business in Iraq and I'm not even going into the Afghan/911 subject - that could take hours. We seem to be fighting in endless war after endless war for someone else's interest and never our defense or as Constitutionally directed and morally required.
I say when that when it comes to making war, first it should be a just, righteous course as proven to, and approved by, the Congress. After this seriously contemplated action is approved, there is no other way to accomplish the goal of war but to go in fast, utterly destroy the enemy (and only the enemy when feasible) by any means necessary, without cease until they are completely demoralized, broken, unable to wage further war and unconditionally surrendered - in that order. If it's not unconditional, you're doing it wrong.
Not being well prepared with the most effective tools to accomplish these goals and nothing short of them, is simply inexcusable. The word tools must include the unencumbered authority to use them at the warfighter's discretion. Responsibility must include authority.
That's our problem, while we're tangled up getting authorization from the chain of command, the enemy is letting
it fly downrange. Iraq could have worked out well, if we turned it into our gas station. At worst, going there served
the same purpose as Vietnam - we and our enemies needed to duke it out somewhere. Maybe out killing our opponents
20-1 isn't victory, but it's something. Dip-shitting around for years is where we fuck it up. No more "Nation building", please !
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Chimpout Member
Senior Corrections Officer
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes
-
Super Moderator
Senior Corrections Officer
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...apes-Kyiv.html
What really boils my piss, is that niggers think the BLM bullshit extended that far east of Europe.
It didn't.
Ukraine has only let the niggers study there, because they pay to do so.
There are stories all over the Internet of uppity niggers demanding a place on the evacuation buses, which are meant for women and children.
The shit locks coon in the story and the sheboon were apparently trying to push in front of Ukrainian women and children. This is why they were shoved to the back of the queue. Not racism at all. Just niggers acting like niggers in front of people who don't tolerate niggers.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Senior Trustee
LT. Colonel
Originally Posted by
CoonsЯus
RT news has run a story on this too. I'm glad niggers are unwelcome in this part of the world. Nice to see there may be a future for us all after all ! All niggers should be exported back to a place where they can kill, murder, rape, eat shit and dirt, bathe in cow's piss and eat each other with impunity. I suggest Africa.
https://www.rt.com/russia/550787-ukr...-people-train/
Or hayshee!! Niggers need to be with niggers!!
-
Senior Trustee
LT. Colonel
Originally Posted by
LeQuint Dickey Mining Co.
My sentiments, EXACTLY!!
-
Senior Trustee
LT. Colonel
I say when that when it comes to making war, first it should be a just, righteous course as proven to, and approved by, the Congress. After this seriously contemplated action is approved, there is no other way to accomplish the goal of war but to go in fast, utterly destroy the enemy (and only the enemy when feasible) by any means necessary, without cease until they are completely demoralized, broken, unable to wage further war and unconditionally surrendered - in that order. If it's not unconditional, you're doing it wrong.
You mean like when Trump DESTROYED isis?! That's how you handle your enemy. And killing "leader" al bagdadi was a good move too!! Notice how Trump destroyed isis who was ALREADY in existance due to bath house barry 0bungh0le but he didn't get us in new wars.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Senior Trustee
Captain
Originally Posted by
Greasemonkey
Got to test new weapons somewhere.
Ok, while the half of my brain that would normally argue the logic on your point is occupied with something more pressing at the moment, the other half of my brain is just going to go ahead and say that shit was funny.
tweakstick \ˈtwēkˈstik\ 1: A small plastic calibration tool, used for making adjustments on electrical or mechanical equipment. 2: A large wooden calibration tool, used for making adjustments on antiquated farm equipment.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Chimpout Member
Corrections Officer
If they let those niggers in, well we would know EXACTLY what will happen. I don't need to be psychic to know that if they let those niggers in, crime is going to go up, theft, rape, murder you name it. Then they'll be asking themselves the question of why is this happening all of a sudden? They will most likely "try" and find a reason why all these disasters are happening to them and before they know it, they entered a vicious cycle of 'gibs me dat' which in turn will bleed that country dry of endless funding's for those useless waste of oxygen. It's a simple choice really so they'd be wise not to let them in.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Chimpout Member
Corrections Officer
How are there so many niggers in Ukraine?
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Senior Trustee
Sergeant
Originally Posted by
LeQuint Dickey Mining Co.
I'm so sick of hearing Niggers crying "RACISM". Yeah Niggers, we're racist!! Get a fuckin clue!
Exactly!! Apart from that: Who cares? At least in Europe, THEY came here as colonialists, so YT has every right to be racist towards them. They didn't like YT in Apefrica as well (and that is the one and only thing I don't blame them for).
Originally Posted by
LeQuint Dickey Mining Co.
You are absolutely right!
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes
-
Trustee
Senior Corrections Officer
Fun fact: During both the First and Second Anglo-Boer Wars, both the British and the Boers observed a gentlemen's agreement that neither side would arm niggers against the other.
Even in times of tragic brother wars white humans know that the negroid is the enemy of all.
-
Chimpout Member
Corrections Officer
MLK's daughter now is starting up with Prince William that he said something insensitive about Africa when talking about the Ukraine war. Jesus, lady. Calm down. He didn't say anything terrible that I could see. Something about only seeing wars in his lifetime in Asia and Africa and it was unusual for Europe. They really mouth off. I never got what was so great about MLK anyway so it really doesn't matter to me but the liberal whites and so called conservative patriotard whites will be pressured to side with her and condemn Prince William just because MLK was a "great man." Whatever. The poor Polish and white Ukranians. They are doing nothing but getting called racist by the blacks while they are getting killed when the war is aimed at them. They have to make everything about white guilt. First the African students now prince William made some comment which I don't even see where he made the comment or that it was that bad. Blacks are who they are but whites are stupid too and doormats. It really makes me sick. My kids had to go to public school. They had to learn about MLK. I didn't like it but good luck telling the school that.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Trustee
Senior Corrections Officer
Originally Posted by
Ray Cizzums
I have no doubt we've got the tools in the box, but we're shy about breaking them out, unlike muh Russia.
Believe me ladies and gentlemen, you and I have no idea what weapons we could field.
My job (MOS) during my time in the Corps was Aviation Ordnance. I'm intimately familiar with an extensive list of US ordnance.
During the advanced portion of my training/education we were allowed to take notes but forbidden to take our notebooks out of the classroom.
I'm talking 1974 and the ordnance I learned about then, with a security clearance was just a drop in the bucket compared to a more extensive list of inventory.
I remember thinking "if we're only learning about some of the more common ordnance, good Lord what do the have behind the curtain that even a basically trained ordnance personnel arend taught about until later at a more extensive, advanced school. Oh we definitely carry a big stick. Of that I'm sure of.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes
-
Trustee
Captain
Originally Posted by
SC Anemia
Believe me ladies and gentlemen, you and I have no idea what weapons we could field.
My job (MOS) during my time in the Corps was Aviation Ordnance. I'm intimately familiar with an extensive list of US ordnance.
During the advanced portion of my training/education we were allowed to take notes but forbidden to take our notebooks out of the classroom.
I'm talking 1974 and the ordnance I learned about then, with a security clearance was just a drop in the bucket compared to a more extensive list of inventory.
I remember thinking "if we're only learning about some of the more common ordnance, good Lord what do the have behind the curtain that even a basically trained ordnance personnel arend taught about until later at a more extensive, advanced school. Oh we definitely carry a big stick. Of that I'm sure of.
I don't doubt it, but all that firepower takes politicians and brass hats to authorize it's use, transport it to the theater,
get it airborne, then blabber for two hours on the radio while the enemy gets away. My beef is that they blow the budget
on whiz bang horseshit, then send our infantry out under equipped. When ground force commanders were shown the latest
robot mini-tanks, they didn't like the idea of sending out scarce M-240s, Mk19s, and M2 Brownings on them. The top kick Marine
said "We've got something better than a robot - they're called an 0332 Marine. They're responsible for our heavy weapons".
A Russian infantry platoon is issued almost as many GPMGs and rocket launchers as an entire company of US infantry.
Even the Taliban outgunned us 2-1 in this regard, which is ridiculous, as we can be supplied with ammunition by helicopter,
where they have to hump it up mountains.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Trustee
Senior Corrections Officer
Originally Posted by
haywood
I say when that when it comes to making war, first it should be a just, righteous course as proven to, and approved by, the Congress. After this seriously contemplated action is approved, there is no other way to accomplish the goal of war but to go in fast, utterly destroy the enemy (and only the enemy when feasible) by any means necessary, without cease until they are completely demoralized, broken, unable to wage further war and unconditionally surrendered - in that order. If it's not unconditional, you're doing it wrong.
The Marine Corps has a doctrine called violence of action. You could fill a textbook with it but what it all boils down to is acting with overwhelming force and rapidly.
The enemy always gets a vote but when you swoop in quickly with extraordinary violence and force, you remove your enemies options.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Super Moderator
Senior Crime Reporter
LT. Colonel
Originally Posted by
SC Anemia
The Marine Corps has a doctrine called violence of action. You could fill a textbook with it but what it all boils down to is acting with overwhelming force and rapidly.
The enemy always gets a vote but when you swoop in quickly with extraordinary violence and force, you remove your enemies options.
One of my old buddies was an ex Army Ranger, he spoke of that. He said there was a. violence of action b. surprise/stealth c. speed, or some equation like that. He said if you lost one, you lost them all. I miss that guy, he was a funny dude I worked with back in the day. He was one of the Army Rangers that first crossed into Iraq before Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm and all that shit in the middle east broke out in the early nineties.
Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to avoid every nigger you meet.
-
Trustee
Senior Corrections Officer
Originally Posted by
Celticgirl
MLK's daughter now is starting up with Prince William that he said something insensitive about Africa when talking about the Ukraine war. Jesus, lady. Calm down. He didn't say anything terrible that I could see. Something about only seeing wars in his lifetime in Asia and Africa and it was unusual for Europe. They really mouth off. I never got what was so great about MLK anyway so it really doesn't matter to me but the liberal whites and so called conservative patriotard whites will be pressured to side with her and condemn Prince William just because MLK was a "great man." Whatever. The poor Polish and white Ukranians. They are doing nothing but getting called racist by the blacks while they are getting killed when the war is aimed at them. They have to make everything about white guilt. First the African students now prince William made some comment which I don't even see where he made the comment or that it was that bad. Blacks are who they are but whites are stupid too and doormats. It really makes me sick. My kids had to go to public school. They had to learn about MLK. I didn't like it but good luck telling the school that.
Disgraceful, but predictable. Prince William is one of the few sane ones in the British royal family, so it's no surprise that a retarded nigger (redundant, I know) would attack him. The fact that he married a White woman instead of becoming an oil driller like his brother is also definitely a factor in him getting targeted.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Chimpout Member
Corrections Officer
Originally Posted by
Whitey Ford
Yay mon, bix nood y dey be no lettin uzzz into dat Poland an sheeyit...
Well, the fence is up. Still, racial purity can get subverted, through access to student visas. Here in this video, a blonde Polish Mudshark is to be seen. Given her weight alone, it's obvious to see why passing-on her genes requires dramatically lowering her standards:
Humiliation through derision, since 1965
-
Chimpout Member
Corrections Officer
Originally Posted by
SC Anemia
I remember thinking "if we're only learning about some of the more common ordnance, good Lord what do the have behind the curtain that even a basically trained ordnance personnel arend taught about until later at a more extensive, advanced school. Oh we definitely carry a big stick. Of that I'm sure of.
I remember as a kid seeing a documentary about some stuff that seemed extremely exotic to me at the time, like Skeet, pop-up recoilless projectile launchers, and rolling mines. I wish I could find it on YouTube or something, but it's been a really long time. I can't even imagine what sort of stuff might be out there now. AFAIC, anything that destroys the enemy without risking combat personnel should be used first.