The muh dik brotherhood

[Whitey Ford]

https://i.imgur.com/oRDVQB4.jpg


The title of this painting is "Roi d'Hommes," translated as "King of Men." It came to mind as I was reading about a phenomenon called the "rat king," where a collection of rats' tails are intertwined and bound together. Squirrel kings have also been observed. The way its happen is still unknown but There are many attempt of explanations online if you're interested.

https://i.imgur.com/3eNsoov.png

https://www.instagram.com/laetitiaky/

[haywood]

https://i.imgur.com/oRDVQB4.jpg



https://i.imgur.com/3eNsoov.png

https://www.instagram.com/laetitiaky/

MUH DIK to da' tenf DEGREE!!

[IseDaDiva]

The sow must have received the same 'Secret Africoon Elongation Ritual" spam I get all time and it made her frisky.

Do they EVER think about anything but muh dik muh, chiggun and committing crimes?

If they were forced to work every day and all day, there would be so much less of these stupid, nasty, hypersexual monkeyshines.

[Ignatow]

The concept of art eludes niggers. Art is to capture the human spark of imagination, to ennoble, to enrich, to stimulate. Or in the case of abstract art, to come to your conclusions, to think and ponder.

Niggers cannot grasp art because they're not human after all, and there's nothing noble about them. Then also they don't have the mental capacity to think beyond muk dikk and chiggun, so they can't extend any creativity. Thus they focus on the obscene, the grotesque, the basest and primitive.

No one with any taste can call these art. Then again, is it any wonder why African "art" is so ugly and resembles trash?

[IseDaDiva]

The concept of art eludes niggers. Art is to capture the human spark of imagination, to ennoble, to enrich, to stimulate. Or in the case of abstract art, to come to your conclusions, to think and ponder.

Niggers cannot grasp art because they're not human after all, and there's nothing noble about them. Then also they don't have the mental capacity to think beyond muk dikk and chiggun, so they can't extend any creativity. Thus they focus on the obscene, the grotesque, the basest and primitive.

No one with any taste can call these art. Then again, is it any wonder why African "art" is so ugly and resembles trash?

Pornographic "muh dik/muh poosay" trash. Animals have way more self-control over their urges.

500-year-old Africoon art:
24637

500-year-old human art:
24638

[Jim Crow]

Everything niggers do is provoked by they instincs.Muh food,muh dik,muh poosay ect…. Niggers aren’t human! They're a lower species of stupid destructive beasts and belong deep in the jungles where they’re from!

[Whitey Ford]

The concept of art eludes niggers. Art is to capture the human spark of imagination, to ennoble, to enrich, to stimulate. Or in the case of abstract art, to come to your conclusions, to think and ponder.

Niggers cannot grasp art because they're not human after all, and there's nothing noble about them. Then also they don't have the mental capacity to think beyond muk dikk and chiggun


Pornographic "muh dik/muh poosay" trash. Animals have way more self-control over their urges.



Everything niggers do is provoked by they instincs.Muh food,muh dik,muh poosay ect…. Niggers aren’t human! They're a lower species of stupid destructive beasts and belong deep in the jungles where they’re from!

Yep. Muh dik is a traditional nigger art mainstay.

https://i.imgur.com/UqBb5C9.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/N8V7si2.jpg

https://i.ibb.co/grrX9fP/Fon8701.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/fEGuh37.jpg

https://i.ibb.co/BjYN4s9/1019420-Figure-13-2.jpg

[Ignatow]

Yep. Muh dik is a traditional nigger art mainstay.

https://i.imgur.com/UqBb5C9.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/N8V7si2.jpg

https://i.ibb.co/grrX9fP/Fon8701.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/fEGuh37.jpg

https://i.ibb.co/BjYN4s9/1019420-Figure-13-2.jpg

If one has noticed Greek, Roman, and later Italian art of the Renaissance, you'd see Spartan warriors, Roman nobles, and Michaelangelo's David in the nude with a rather small muh-dikk. The Greeks believed in fighting, in an earlier way, nude, and they called that "heroic nude". They minimized the focus on the penis size; they called Persians barbaric for supposedly having large muh-dikks. It's as if to say, we are civilized, we have gone away from the animal into a human, instead of being ruled by lust, we can control our thoughts.

Michaelangelo's David follows the same presentation. Again, the triumph of being a rational human, over the urges of the little head. Brilliant, if you ask me.

Contrast with nigger "art". Always muh big dikk. Is it any wonder why they're still more animal than human? Their art is but an extension of carnal lust, and nothing else. That's why it's not art, it's nigger trash. Of course, if I put forth this as the hypothesis for my Ph.D dissertation, I'm sure I'd be kicked out for being such a racist. I won't even have the 1st Amendment right to present and defend it, so as not to offend the apes.

Niggers, nothing but savage beings hundreds of thousands years behind!

[IseDaDiva]

If one has noticed Greek, Roman, and later Italian art of the Renaissance, you'd see Spartan warriors, Roman nobles, and Michaelangelo's David in the nude with a rather small muh-dikk. The Greeks believed in fighting, in an earlier way, nude, and they called that "heroic nude". They minimized the focus on the penis size; they called Persians barbaric for supposedly having large muh-dikks. It's as if to say, we are civilized, we have gone away from the animal into a human, instead of being ruled by lust, we can control our thoughts.

Michaelangelo's David follows the same presentation. Again, the triumph of being a rational human, over the urges of the little head. Brilliant, if you ask me.

Contrast with nigger "art". Always muh big dikk. Is it any wonder why they're still more animal than human? Their art is but an extension of carnal lust, and nothing else. That's why it's not art, it's nigger trash. Of course, if I put forth this as the hypothesis for my Ph.D dissertation, I'm sure I'd be kicked out for being such a racist. I won't even have the 1st Amendment right to present and defend it, so as not to offend the apes.

Niggers, nothing but savage beings hundreds of thousands years behind!

Yes, large endowments were considered vulgar, so they were de-emphasized in their art. For niggroes, OTOH, muh dik is the be-all and end-all. They have little else to display, brag, or think about whether they're squatting in their cow manure huts or their Sec8 nests, besides muh dik/muh poosay, and their other base urges and drives.

I doubt any human artists stuck a great big giant peen on any of their works.

Rodin:
24665



I really don't believe Libtards and self-proclaimed nigger lovers really do see them as "just like us". It's not possible.