Unregistered
05-21-2022, 11:01 PM
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck_v._Bell
Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court, written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., in which the Court ruled that a state statute permitting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, "for the protection and health of the state" did not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the State for these lesser sacrifices, often not felt to be such by those concerned, to prevent our being swamped with incompetence. It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination (e.g. COVID-19 vaccines) is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes of the negro species.
The effect of Buck v. Bell was to legitimize eugenic sterilization laws in the United States as a whole. After Buck v. Bell, dozens of states added new sterilization statutes, or updated their constitutionally non-functional ones already enacted, with statutes which more closely mirrored the Virginia statute upheld by the Court.
Can you imagine a USA where all of the niggers have been sterilized? It would be fucking BEAUTIFUL.
And this may not be the most politically correct opinion, but I'm not 100% sold on the idea of humans with IQ's of 65 or less breeding. I mean, do we really want to live in even more of an idiocracy than we already are?
Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court, written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., in which the Court ruled that a state statute permitting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, "for the protection and health of the state" did not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the State for these lesser sacrifices, often not felt to be such by those concerned, to prevent our being swamped with incompetence. It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination (e.g. COVID-19 vaccines) is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes of the negro species.
The effect of Buck v. Bell was to legitimize eugenic sterilization laws in the United States as a whole. After Buck v. Bell, dozens of states added new sterilization statutes, or updated their constitutionally non-functional ones already enacted, with statutes which more closely mirrored the Virginia statute upheld by the Court.
Can you imagine a USA where all of the niggers have been sterilized? It would be fucking BEAUTIFUL.
And this may not be the most politically correct opinion, but I'm not 100% sold on the idea of humans with IQ's of 65 or less breeding. I mean, do we really want to live in even more of an idiocracy than we already are?