Whitey Ford
01-30-2020, 11:12 AM
Black Scientists Held Back by Perceptions of Their Priorities
New research suggests “hard/lab science” is valued over “patient-focused science” in awarding research grants.
https://i.imgur.com/GwhBbR3.jpg
The gibs muh dat gravy train doesn't apply to the sciences, niggers.
Eight years ago, a study published in Science found that black researchers were 10 percentage points less likely than white ones to receive funding from the National Institutes of Health, even after controlling for factors like educational background, previous research awards and publication record. Its authors theorized that the difference might reflect an accumulation of slight advantages over the course of white scientists’ careers.
Wait for it.
But new research suggests racial disparity in grant funding persists, and offers a fresh theory about a source of some of it: research topic choice.
Research choice LOL. I wondre what that could be.
Some of the keywords used in applications less likely to get funding: “socioeconomic,” “patient” and “disparity.” The lowest award rate was for those using the terms “ovary,” “fertility” and “reproductive.” Successful applications, by contrast, tended to use words like “neuron” and “cartilage.”
Nigger 'social scientists' who 'study' the nigger sciences of racisms, disparate impact and so-called socioeconomics get less funding because those aren't real sciences.
https://archive.is/uIR0b#selection-635.0-635.295
New research suggests “hard/lab science” is valued over “patient-focused science” in awarding research grants.
https://i.imgur.com/GwhBbR3.jpg
The gibs muh dat gravy train doesn't apply to the sciences, niggers.
Eight years ago, a study published in Science found that black researchers were 10 percentage points less likely than white ones to receive funding from the National Institutes of Health, even after controlling for factors like educational background, previous research awards and publication record. Its authors theorized that the difference might reflect an accumulation of slight advantages over the course of white scientists’ careers.
Wait for it.
But new research suggests racial disparity in grant funding persists, and offers a fresh theory about a source of some of it: research topic choice.
Research choice LOL. I wondre what that could be.
Some of the keywords used in applications less likely to get funding: “socioeconomic,” “patient” and “disparity.” The lowest award rate was for those using the terms “ovary,” “fertility” and “reproductive.” Successful applications, by contrast, tended to use words like “neuron” and “cartilage.”
Nigger 'social scientists' who 'study' the nigger sciences of racisms, disparate impact and so-called socioeconomics get less funding because those aren't real sciences.
https://archive.is/uIR0b#selection-635.0-635.295