Sandy
01-11-2020, 01:19 PM
Wow, California judges ruled against them?
Sam Singer, a spokesman for Wedgewood, the real estate firm that owns the home, said the company "takes no pleasure in having the sheriff enforce the court's order to evict the squatters," adding that "we urge the squatters to leave voluntarily and peacefully."
"These squatters, as heartfelt as they are, are taking something from someone else, and that goes against the very grain of our society and civilization," Singer said. "Wedgewood has said publicly that it sympathizes with the squatters who broke in, but it doesn't condone the theft of property."
Moms 4 Housing sounded a defiant note after the court ruling, tweeting that "the moms, and the community behind them, will not leave the property."
Dominique Walker, one of the moms in the home, said Friday that she intends to stay despite the court's decision. "Today is not a defeat – it's the beginning of a movement," she said during a press conference held on the walkway of the home, flanked by the other women. "We never thought we'd win in an unjust system. We're up against corporations who are willing to put mothers out on the street."
https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/01/10/moms-4-housing-loses-court-case-must-vacate-west-oakland-home/
Actually, niggers, we don't want you on the streets either. We want you gone from our country.
OAKLAND — After a judge ruled Friday that she has no right to stay in the home she’s been squatting in since November, Dominique Walker of activist group Moms 4 Housing said the sheriff’s office is going to have to arrest her to get her out.
“We are here. And we’re not leaving,” Walker, founder of the group calling attention to the city’s homeless crisis, said to the cheers of supporters gathered outside the house on Magnolia Street in West Oakland.
Dealing a blow to the movement built by Walker and several other homeless mothers, Alameda County Superior Court Judge Patrick McKinney rejected Walker’s argument that she should be allowed to stay in the house because “housing is a human right” and she has nowhere else to go. The women, who moved into the empty, investor-owned West Oakland house Nov. 18 without the owner’s permission, argue speculators shouldn’t be allowed to hold vacant property while there are thousands of homeless residents in the city.
Wedgewood, the real estate investment company that owns the property, applauded the judge’s ruling in a case that has drawn national attention. The one-page order authorizes the sheriff’s office to evict the women within five days. The group previously has declined to say how many people are living in the home.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/moms-4-housing-say-they-should-be-allowed-to-purchase-property-theyre-squatting-in-but-current-owners-disagree/
10626
So there by the niggers' own admission, they have no right to stay in the home. Human rights do not apply to them, and guess what, there's no "right to housing" anyway. There's no right to taking over property that belongs to someone else, and it's tactics like this that turn a half-ruined neighborhood into completely ruined. We all know that house will now need to be razed to the ground after being turned into a crack den.
God, I'd love to be a fly on the wall if they resist against a bunch of human deputies.
Sam Singer, a spokesman for Wedgewood, the real estate firm that owns the home, said the company "takes no pleasure in having the sheriff enforce the court's order to evict the squatters," adding that "we urge the squatters to leave voluntarily and peacefully."
"These squatters, as heartfelt as they are, are taking something from someone else, and that goes against the very grain of our society and civilization," Singer said. "Wedgewood has said publicly that it sympathizes with the squatters who broke in, but it doesn't condone the theft of property."
Moms 4 Housing sounded a defiant note after the court ruling, tweeting that "the moms, and the community behind them, will not leave the property."
Dominique Walker, one of the moms in the home, said Friday that she intends to stay despite the court's decision. "Today is not a defeat – it's the beginning of a movement," she said during a press conference held on the walkway of the home, flanked by the other women. "We never thought we'd win in an unjust system. We're up against corporations who are willing to put mothers out on the street."
https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/01/10/moms-4-housing-loses-court-case-must-vacate-west-oakland-home/
Actually, niggers, we don't want you on the streets either. We want you gone from our country.
OAKLAND — After a judge ruled Friday that she has no right to stay in the home she’s been squatting in since November, Dominique Walker of activist group Moms 4 Housing said the sheriff’s office is going to have to arrest her to get her out.
“We are here. And we’re not leaving,” Walker, founder of the group calling attention to the city’s homeless crisis, said to the cheers of supporters gathered outside the house on Magnolia Street in West Oakland.
Dealing a blow to the movement built by Walker and several other homeless mothers, Alameda County Superior Court Judge Patrick McKinney rejected Walker’s argument that she should be allowed to stay in the house because “housing is a human right” and she has nowhere else to go. The women, who moved into the empty, investor-owned West Oakland house Nov. 18 without the owner’s permission, argue speculators shouldn’t be allowed to hold vacant property while there are thousands of homeless residents in the city.
Wedgewood, the real estate investment company that owns the property, applauded the judge’s ruling in a case that has drawn national attention. The one-page order authorizes the sheriff’s office to evict the women within five days. The group previously has declined to say how many people are living in the home.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/moms-4-housing-say-they-should-be-allowed-to-purchase-property-theyre-squatting-in-but-current-owners-disagree/
10626
So there by the niggers' own admission, they have no right to stay in the home. Human rights do not apply to them, and guess what, there's no "right to housing" anyway. There's no right to taking over property that belongs to someone else, and it's tactics like this that turn a half-ruined neighborhood into completely ruined. We all know that house will now need to be razed to the ground after being turned into a crack den.
God, I'd love to be a fly on the wall if they resist against a bunch of human deputies.