Google suppressing truth about nigger crime statistics in search results

[Whitey Ford]

Google vs. Bing on "Black White Crime Stats" (http://www.unz.com/isteve/google-vs-bing-on-black-white-crime-stats/)

Who would've thunk that Bing was way more honest than Google about nigger crime statistics?


Google promotes on its first page of results three fairly neutral sources (Channel4, Wikipedia, and USNews) and two sources that are biased toward the politically correct (SPLC and ColorLines). Bing cites one fairly neutral source (Wikipedia) and two biased toward the politically incorrect (WhitePrivilegeIsntReal and InfoWars).

It’s interesting that the excerpt chosen from the one source displayed on the first page by both Google and Bing, Wikipedia’s “Race and crime in the United States,” is ambiguous in Google and eye-opening on Bing.

[Whitey Ford]

Ha ha ha Google search for "American Scientists" you get a ton of niggers, in Bing search, not so much.
More Great Moments in Google Gaslight: American Scientists (http://www.unz.com/isteve/more-great-moments-in-google-gaslight/)

5700

5701


In Google’s estimation, the top 11 American scientists are 10 blacks and Albert Einstein.

In Bing’s estimation, the top 11 American scientists are 3 blacks and eight whites: Einstein, Franklin, Tesla, Bell, Watson, Oppenheimer, Sagan, and Hubble.

At Bing, Black History Month is February. But at Google, Black History Month is year-round, 365/24.